squad logo size with 1.16, compared to 1.14? |
squad logo size with 1.16, compared to 1.14? |
Jun 12 2009, 10:54
Post
#1
|
|
New Member Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 12-June 09 From: Finland Member No.: 5,920 |
Hi guys.
After demolishing our old clan and assembling a new one I had to make a new online tag. I made the first template in 128x128 and it was showing just fine. Then the second one with same size does not show at all. (First one did not work as 256x256) I can't remember anymore were there any difference in 1.14 and 1.16 servers in how to present the picture? Should it be *png instead of *paa? What's your experience with different tag sizes? BR VanhA (Former WASP-ArmA regiment leader) EDIT: OK, turned out the problem is somehow our server related. I applied the image to my own site and hosted from my url and it worked a charm. This post has been edited by VanhA: Jun 13 2009, 20:28 -------------------- |
|
|
Jun 14 2009, 23:57
Post
#2
|
|
ArmA.info Sarcasm Society's Slightly Mad Scotsman Group: Former .info Serviceman Posts: 718 Joined: 28-September 07 From: Glasgow, UK Member No.: 1,331 |
It should be PAA and I'd advise using a logo of 512x512 at minimum, if your using a "webs" or freewebs account to host your XML you may encounter problems.
-------------------- Never before in the history of man, was so much buggered up by so few.
|
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 07:56
Post
#3
|
|
New Member Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 12-June 09 From: Finland Member No.: 5,920 |
It should be PAA and I'd advise using a logo of 512x512 at minimum, if your using a "webs" or freewebs account to host your XML you may encounter problems. Yeah I know the size regulations. I actually got it working with changing the name of the file. Odd as it sounds. It is *paa 256x256. We host the xml at same place as the arma server itself. Sorted. -------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 04:36 |